Section 186 of Insolvency Act CAP 53: No privilege against self-incrimination, but statements not generally admissible in criminal proceedings against their maker

    

(1) A person (including the bankrupt) who is examined or questioned at a public examination of a bankrupt shall answer all questions put to the person in relation to the bankrupt's conduct, affairs and property to the extent that the person is able to do so.
(2) A person is not excused from answering a question because the question may incriminate or tend to incriminate the person.
(3) Except as provided by subsection (4), a statement made by a person examined or questioned under this Part in response to a question put to the person in the course of the public examination of a bankrupt is not admissible in criminal proceedings against the person.
(4) Such a statement is admissible in any such proceedings if—
(a) the person was examined or questioned under oath and is charged with an offence under—
(i) section 108 of the Penal Code (Cap. 63) (which deals with perjury and subornation of perjury); or
(ii) section 114 of that Code (which deals with false swearing); or
(b) the statement was made by the bankrupt and the bankrupt is charged with an offence under section 187(1) (c) or (d).


Disclaimer: This document is not to be taken as legal advise.

Enhance Your Research with Bookmarks and Annotations

Here's how you can use these features:

  • To bookmark this page, click the "Bookmark this Page" button below the document title.
  • To add an annotation, highlight text in the document and select "Add Annotation" from the toolbar that appears.
  • These features are great for organizing your research and keeping track of key information.
  • You can view and manage your bookmarks and annotations on your Bookmarks and Annotations page.

Cited By:



More Sections